The Journal of Military History

Abstract

The unsuccessful attack by a massive British army against the French position at Fort Carillon (Fort Ticonderoga) on July 8, 1758 came as a shock to the British Empire. The failure of the attack has been attributed to a range of causes. The most prominent among them has been the accusation that an over-optimistic report on the French defenses made by a young engineer, Matthew Clerk, was the reason for an unsuccessful frontal attack. While many historians place the blame for the defeat on general mismanagement of the British army by the expedition’s commander, General James Abercromby, few have disputed the general’s claim that Clerk deserves a large share of the blame. Evidence from letters and other documents associated with the engineer serves to clarify a complex and confusing episode in the history of the French and Indian War.

Read the full article

Members: read on EBSCO

Use the access code from this quarter's member email. Every issue since 1937 is online, with no embargo.

Open on EBSCO

Lost your code? Email jmhsmh@vmi.edu or sign in at the EBSCOhost member login.

Not a member? Buy this article

A PDF sent by email from the Journal office during business hours, $10.

Order the PDF

Through a library: sign in with your institution

Full text is in EBSCO's America: History and Life with Full Text and Historical Abstracts with Full Text, and through EBSCO Discovery.

Institutional sign-in

Join: read everything, every year

Membership includes the printed journal and full online access to the archive.

Join the Society

Cite this article

Ronald F. Kingsley and Harvey J. Alexander, “The Failure of Abercromby's Attack on Fort Carillon, July 1758, and the Scapegoating of Matthew Clerk,” The Journal of Military History 72, no. 1 (January 2008): 43–70.

RISBibTeXDOI: 10.1353/jmh.2008.0068

Also in Vol. 72, No. 1

  1. Moncado Prize 2009