The Journal of Military History

Abstract

During the first decade of the twenty-first century, defense analysts identified the emergence of “hybrid warfare” as a compelling threat to American national security. Generally speaking, hybrid warfare consists of “conflict involving a combination of conventional military forces and irregulars … which could include both state and non-state actors, aimed at achieving a common political purpose.” This paper uses as a case study of hybrid warfare a specific campaign in the U.S. Civil War where conventional and unconventional operations were significant factors. It considers Maj. Gen. Philip Sheridan’s efforts to defeat the Confederate hybrid threat in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley, the particular dynamics and challenges he confronted, and the factors that enabled him to prevail. By doing so, it will both draw on and contribute to the growing body of literature on the campaign and the challenge of countering hybrid warfare.

Read the full article

Members: read on EBSCO

Use the access code from this quarter's member email. Every issue since 1937 is online, with no embargo.

Open on EBSCO

Lost your code? Email jmhsmh@vmi.edu or sign in at the EBSCOhost member login.

Not a member? Buy this article

A PDF sent by email from the Journal office during business hours, $10.

Order the PDF

Through a library: sign in with your institution

Full text is in EBSCO's America: History and Life with Full Text and Historical Abstracts with Full Text, and through EBSCO Discovery.

Institutional sign-in

Join: read everything, every year

Membership includes the printed journal and full online access to the archive.

Join the Society

Cite this article

Ethan S. Rafuse, “’Little Phil,’ a ’Bad Old Man’, and the ’Gray Ghost’: Hybrid Warfare and the Fight for the Shenandoah Valley, August–November 1864,” The Journal of Military History 81, no. 3 (July 2017): 775–801.

RISBibTeX

Also in Vol. 81, No. 3

  1. George C. Marshall Lecture

  2. Moncado Prize 2018

  3. Review essay