Abstract
For decades, a belief has persisted that before 1914 the Admiralty in Edwardian Britain was strategically bereft, if not bankrupt, when faced with the modern conditions imposed on naval warfare by mines, torpedoes and submarines. War plans generated under the regime of Admiral Sir A. John “Jacky” Fisher, in particular, have been scorned as politically-inspired smokescreens, designed to prop up Fisher’s position as First Sea Lord. A re-examination of the Ballard Committee’s 1907 War Plans against Germany, however, and the contexts within which they were drafted, especially the Baltic neutrality crisis provoked by Norwegian independence in 1905, indicates that the measures were legitimate contingency plans designed to effectively exploit the Royal Navy’s ability to strike decisively at Germany’s military and economic assets in the Baltic. New evidence, with respect to pre-existing strategic planning, fleet manoeuvres, British East Coast development and the procurement of vessels to fill tactical requirements detailed in the plans, demonstrate that previous skeptical interpretations of the Fisher Admiralty’s strategic acumen have been mistaken.
Read the full article
Members: read on EBSCO
Use the access code from this quarter's member email. Every issue since 1937 is online, with no embargo.
Lost your code? Email jmhsmh@vmi.edu or sign in at the EBSCOhost member login.
Not a member? Buy this article
A PDF sent by email from the Journal office during business hours, $10.
Through a library: sign in with your institution
Full text is in EBSCO's America: History and Life with Full Text and Historical Abstracts with Full Text, and through EBSCO Discovery.
Join: read everything, every year
Membership includes the printed journal and full online access to the archive.
Cite this article
Shawn Grimes, “The Baltic and Admiralty War Planning, 1906–1907,” The Journal of Military History 74, no. 2 (April 2010): 407–437.
